OK guys,
as promised I am writing something on this subject. I will keep it short and simple.
Will Liverpool finally win the Top Division domestic league and as such end a 19 year drought? Will Man Utd win this year's league and thus equal Liverpool's 18th league title record?
First off. Liverpool will not win the title while Gerrard is still around. Him winning the Premiership would really make a potential romantic tragic hero story, well, just unrealised potential. History prefers to spin drama - and she has Gerrard as the main cast for this particular thread (if it is any consolation, we know Gerrard makes millions in this role).
Second. Man Utd will equal Liverpool's record this very season. History compels that they do. Drama demands it. Also, until Ferguson finally retires in 100 years time, Man Utd will continue to have the winning mentality that all her Premiership colleagues lack, and thus win.
---
I have no idea why after 19 years of chronic defeats there are still non-resident Liverpool fans, especially those age below 35 this year.* What is so appealing about failures and disasters?** Except maybe the secret twisted desire to see how long it will last? Maybe it provides comfort to some of us, not unlike the fact that some of us prefer not-so-good news on TV, especially after a hard day at work. And if that is the case, then I think Liverpool will lose a lot of fans when they eventually do win the title.
Ok Man Utd. How do you argue with success? What is wrong with jumping onto the bandwagon of a consistently winning team? Don't we celebrate success anymore?
*Of course Tony, my brother, and a Liverpool fan, is different and exempt from my arguments :).
** Any true supporter has to agree that not winning the domestic title for 19 years, is in fact both disaster and failure.
Family Image
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Friday, March 20, 2009
Happy Birthday My Wife!
Yes! My wife hits 3 cards today!
For her presents I ordered from Manchester United Online Shopping: 1 Home jersey with Number 10 Rooney ladies fit, 1 Home jersey with Number 10 Rooney man's, 1 baby's jersey full home kit, 1 baby's pack complete with cap. Total damage around USD$250. and also a complementary free Man Utd flag!
Hey, there's no more perfect reason to get the whole family Man Utd kit right, ya!
Ethan seems to be able to just big enough to fit the baby's pack, although the jersey kit seems a bit big for him at the moment (I ordered the 12-18 months size). Hmm.. not bad.. Ethan's as big as the European Ang Mohs! Sure can jostle with them no problem! Watch out for him in 16 years time - he'll grace the European football stage in spectacular style! (thats assuming our Asian stage haven't caught up by then....).
Oh, and I think i can fit into the "L" size i orderd. Lucky I was realistic enough to resist the 'M' size option...
And oh, I forgot about my wife... hmm she's been hinting I might be neglecting her. Short answer: No, no way! Long answer, let me explain:
You see, when you know how to ride a bicycle, or know how to swim, you'll know how to do it for the rest of your life. You'll stop thinking about it even when you are doing it, but that doesn't mean you forget, does it? When I first memorise the multiplication table, I thought about it everyday (lest i got whacked - ok that's putting it a bit far-fetch but you get my point). But when I learned the table, I dun have to think about it anymore. It has become a part of me, instinctively and intuitively. And thats the way it is the same with me my wife. She has become a part of me.
Touching huh?
You see, I am a romantic person. On my best days I put Cassanova to shame. I'm a Piscean with Pisces ascendant, after all.
*
I wish my wife a very Happy Birthday.
ps* : I wanted to write about Candy, how we met, how was she like then, and how's she now, etc, etc... But I have to deny the readers this privilege, I'm not ready to share her with the world yet. Have I told you I am a Piscean with Pisces ascendant and Scorpio moon sign?
For her presents I ordered from Manchester United Online Shopping: 1 Home jersey with Number 10 Rooney ladies fit, 1 Home jersey with Number 10 Rooney man's, 1 baby's jersey full home kit, 1 baby's pack complete with cap. Total damage around USD$250. and also a complementary free Man Utd flag!
Hey, there's no more perfect reason to get the whole family Man Utd kit right, ya!
Ethan seems to be able to just big enough to fit the baby's pack, although the jersey kit seems a bit big for him at the moment (I ordered the 12-18 months size). Hmm.. not bad.. Ethan's as big as the European Ang Mohs! Sure can jostle with them no problem! Watch out for him in 16 years time - he'll grace the European football stage in spectacular style! (thats assuming our Asian stage haven't caught up by then....).
Oh, and I think i can fit into the "L" size i orderd. Lucky I was realistic enough to resist the 'M' size option...
And oh, I forgot about my wife... hmm she's been hinting I might be neglecting her. Short answer: No, no way! Long answer, let me explain:
You see, when you know how to ride a bicycle, or know how to swim, you'll know how to do it for the rest of your life. You'll stop thinking about it even when you are doing it, but that doesn't mean you forget, does it? When I first memorise the multiplication table, I thought about it everyday (lest i got whacked - ok that's putting it a bit far-fetch but you get my point). But when I learned the table, I dun have to think about it anymore. It has become a part of me, instinctively and intuitively. And thats the way it is the same with me my wife. She has become a part of me.
Touching huh?
You see, I am a romantic person. On my best days I put Cassanova to shame. I'm a Piscean with Pisces ascendant, after all.
*
I wish my wife a very Happy Birthday.
ps* : I wanted to write about Candy, how we met, how was she like then, and how's she now, etc, etc... But I have to deny the readers this privilege, I'm not ready to share her with the world yet. Have I told you I am a Piscean with Pisces ascendant and Scorpio moon sign?
Friday, February 27, 2009
Reading Time Ethan!
Ethan likes to read! From the picture you can see that he is browsing through the "Alpha Centauri Strategy Guide", which I bought in Melbourne years ago. I'm seeding the concepts like "theory of everything", "relativity theory", "quantum theory", "string theory", etc, in him early. Well you never know he might just be very interested in such things! Not that I am expert in such things, but I too have had been interested in such things, but never gotten pass the introductory stages.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Car Thieves in Singapore
Recently I cam across numerous reports on cars being broken into in public carparks in Singapore. http://www.asiaone.com/Motoring/Owners/Story/A1Story20090211-121206.html
I am not sure if there is an actual increase in such crimes, or simply due to more reporting from the relevant media on such cases. But if there is really an increase in cases of cars being broken into and stuffs stolen, then this development is a cause for concern.
Lets look at some points at hand:
Fact: In such crimes, usually the cars are being stripped of their accessories (like gauges, steroes, etc), and sometimes even the wheels!
Fact: Modus operandi is breaking of the windshield to get to the items inside, and or jacking up the car to steal the wheels.
Fact: The locations in which the crimes took place are in public carparks.
From the above points we can put up an imaginary, but realistic settings like this:
I drive home after a day, park my beloved car at my usual carpark spot, which is 4th floor at the multistorey. I park high up, even though there are empty slots at lower floors, because I want to minimise the chances of my car being scratched accidentally or kenna a chip from a careless door opening fromneighbouring cars. I have many performance items installed in my car, even my wheels (forged rims) are imported from Japan which costs $650 per rim.
Next morning I discovered my car's windshield was broken, all my performance gauges ripped off, my $2,000 stereo unit stolen, my $43 cash card gone, my Emanage Ultimate engine management unit which cost me $2,000 has gone too. And most embarrassingly, my imported wheels, which cost me $1,000 per rim including the tyres, are gone. And my car sits stupidly on 4 bricks. Also, my personal laptop was stolen from my car boot as well.
I reported the case to the police. But alas, the case is very unlikely to be solved. I am not so sure if the police places these type of cases high on their priority, because this concerns a car, and nobody was physically injured. I feel extremely sad and am very frustrated.
------
Ok guys, do I deserve this plight? Do I deserve this because I spend so much money on my car? Do I deserve this because my car is considered "too loud", or a "thief magnet"? http://motoring.asiaone.com/Motoring/Owners/Story/A1Story20090130-118246.html
Do I deserve that my laptop be stolen just because I leave it in my car?
If I deserve this, then can I also successfully argue that a woman deserves to be raped just because she spends too much on her physical appearance and wear too revealing a blouse, and chooses to walk alone in a dark alley at night?
The answer is of course "NO"! Not in OUR society! Not in SINGAPORE!
And what makes this even worse is that it happens in a public place in our housing neighbourhood where we live, in broad daylight (ok night); plus also the fact that the thieves even have the temerity to steal the wheels (with all the jacking up, unscrewing, etc...)! This means they feel comfortable enough that they have enough time to commit the crime.
If this is a trend that is growing, then i consider that THIS IS A DIRECT AND QUITE OPEN CHALLENGE ON THE AUTHORITY, I type the words in capital letters just in case they miss this important point.
And just in case the readers forget, nobody openly challenges our authority with crime and gets away (easily).
Relevant readers, take note.
I am not sure if there is an actual increase in such crimes, or simply due to more reporting from the relevant media on such cases. But if there is really an increase in cases of cars being broken into and stuffs stolen, then this development is a cause for concern.
Lets look at some points at hand:
Fact: In such crimes, usually the cars are being stripped of their accessories (like gauges, steroes, etc), and sometimes even the wheels!
Fact: Modus operandi is breaking of the windshield to get to the items inside, and or jacking up the car to steal the wheels.
Fact: The locations in which the crimes took place are in public carparks.
From the above points we can put up an imaginary, but realistic settings like this:
I drive home after a day, park my beloved car at my usual carpark spot, which is 4th floor at the multistorey. I park high up, even though there are empty slots at lower floors, because I want to minimise the chances of my car being scratched accidentally or kenna a chip from a careless door opening fromneighbouring cars. I have many performance items installed in my car, even my wheels (forged rims) are imported from Japan which costs $650 per rim.
Next morning I discovered my car's windshield was broken, all my performance gauges ripped off, my $2,000 stereo unit stolen, my $43 cash card gone, my Emanage Ultimate engine management unit which cost me $2,000 has gone too. And most embarrassingly, my imported wheels, which cost me $1,000 per rim including the tyres, are gone. And my car sits stupidly on 4 bricks. Also, my personal laptop was stolen from my car boot as well.
I reported the case to the police. But alas, the case is very unlikely to be solved. I am not so sure if the police places these type of cases high on their priority, because this concerns a car, and nobody was physically injured. I feel extremely sad and am very frustrated.
------
Ok guys, do I deserve this plight? Do I deserve this because I spend so much money on my car? Do I deserve this because my car is considered "too loud", or a "thief magnet"? http://motoring.asiaone.com/Motoring/Owners/Story/A1Story20090130-118246.html
Do I deserve that my laptop be stolen just because I leave it in my car?
If I deserve this, then can I also successfully argue that a woman deserves to be raped just because she spends too much on her physical appearance and wear too revealing a blouse, and chooses to walk alone in a dark alley at night?
The answer is of course "NO"! Not in OUR society! Not in SINGAPORE!
And what makes this even worse is that it happens in a public place in our housing neighbourhood where we live, in broad daylight (ok night); plus also the fact that the thieves even have the temerity to steal the wheels (with all the jacking up, unscrewing, etc...)! This means they feel comfortable enough that they have enough time to commit the crime.
If this is a trend that is growing, then i consider that THIS IS A DIRECT AND QUITE OPEN CHALLENGE ON THE AUTHORITY, I type the words in capital letters just in case they miss this important point.
And just in case the readers forget, nobody openly challenges our authority with crime and gets away (easily).
Relevant readers, take note.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Ethan's Photos 19 Jan 2009
Ethan likes to eat...
And he gets pissed off when he realises the Chupa Chups doesn't taste particularly well...
It's not easy to get a clear shot when using handphone camera, there tends to be a lag between the click and actual shot, and especially when Ethan likes to move around.
Ethan savouring his long-awaited milk... 3-hour interval to be precise.. Usually, he'll start "requesting" for milk well before the 3-hour mark, and occassionally when Candy's not alert.. Kelvin will accede to Ethan's "request".. hehe..
Candy and Ethan ready to head back from Granddad's house to our house over the weekend.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
The Disgraceful State of Singapore Football
Last month I went to the Kallang Stadium to watch the 2nd leg of ASEAN cup, match between Singapore and Vietnam.
The Kallang spirit is still well alive. The match was played to a capacity crowd of more than 55,000 fans!
But...
What loads of CRAP from the Singapore players!!!!!
No strategic awareness.
No confidence.
Zero technical skills.
Total Crap.
Total letdown.
I mean, I have never seen a match with so many BOUNCING BALLS!!!! When you let a ball in the air bounce before you react, that means you have no skills or no confidence in trapping the ball, or first-timing it/ or heading it to your fellow team-mates. Just watch a EPL match, and compare it to the Singapore-Vietnam match... I tell you one can vomit blood when one watch the latter.... I mean, occasionally Ferdinand or Vidic will let the ball bounce, but that is to trick the attacking players... But our Singapore players?, nbz, let ball bounce in opponents' half, let ball bounce in own half, let ball bounce in own penalty box, etc... they just let ball bounce and pray... what crap...
what can I say, except absolute disgraceful display of (non-existent) techical abilities from the Singapore players.
Strategy I can understand and lay blame on manager or coaching staff... But technical skills? NBZ... its all about the players themselves.... how much a player put into practising his technical skills will invariably be displayed in full during a competitive match. How much a player practises or train will invariably show how confident he is during a competitve match as well.
Therefore, with so many BOUNCING BALLS in a match, I can conclude conclusively that our current batch of Singapore players do not train or practise enough. As such they don't have the confidence or skill to trap/first-time/pass a flying ball in a competitve match. And there is only one word to describe the players - PlAIN LAZY (ok, two words).
The current batch of Singapore national players do not have the privilege of calling themselves Lions.
AND PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME OUR NATIONAL TEAM HAS "GAINED VALUABLE EXPERIENCE" FROM THIS OR THAT MATCH! HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE HEAR THAT FROM OUR NATIONAL TEAM???
when you tell me you have "gained experience", or learnt from this or that" enough times, you are giving me excuses. YOU ARE IN THE NATIONAL TEAM FOR *&^%#!@ SAKE, WE EXPECT PERFORMANCE, NOT EXCUSES OK!
Bring back Fandi, bring back Malek Awab, bring back Sundram.
The Kallang spirit is still well alive. The match was played to a capacity crowd of more than 55,000 fans!
But...
What loads of CRAP from the Singapore players!!!!!
No strategic awareness.
No confidence.
Zero technical skills.
Total Crap.
Total letdown.
I mean, I have never seen a match with so many BOUNCING BALLS!!!! When you let a ball in the air bounce before you react, that means you have no skills or no confidence in trapping the ball, or first-timing it/ or heading it to your fellow team-mates. Just watch a EPL match, and compare it to the Singapore-Vietnam match... I tell you one can vomit blood when one watch the latter.... I mean, occasionally Ferdinand or Vidic will let the ball bounce, but that is to trick the attacking players... But our Singapore players?, nbz, let ball bounce in opponents' half, let ball bounce in own half, let ball bounce in own penalty box, etc... they just let ball bounce and pray... what crap...
what can I say, except absolute disgraceful display of (non-existent) techical abilities from the Singapore players.
Strategy I can understand and lay blame on manager or coaching staff... But technical skills? NBZ... its all about the players themselves.... how much a player put into practising his technical skills will invariably be displayed in full during a competitive match. How much a player practises or train will invariably show how confident he is during a competitve match as well.
Therefore, with so many BOUNCING BALLS in a match, I can conclude conclusively that our current batch of Singapore players do not train or practise enough. As such they don't have the confidence or skill to trap/first-time/pass a flying ball in a competitve match. And there is only one word to describe the players - PlAIN LAZY (ok, two words).
The current batch of Singapore national players do not have the privilege of calling themselves Lions.
AND PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME OUR NATIONAL TEAM HAS "GAINED VALUABLE EXPERIENCE" FROM THIS OR THAT MATCH! HOW MANY TIMES HAVE WE HEAR THAT FROM OUR NATIONAL TEAM???
when you tell me you have "gained experience", or learnt from this or that" enough times, you are giving me excuses. YOU ARE IN THE NATIONAL TEAM FOR *&^%#!@ SAKE, WE EXPECT PERFORMANCE, NOT EXCUSES OK!
Bring back Fandi, bring back Malek Awab, bring back Sundram.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Ethan's Pics
Baby happy on Christmas Day luncheon at Aunt Daisy's new house.
Ethan contented and resting at AMK.
Monday, December 29, 2008
Bank Crises and Bankers' Renumeration Part 3
A few weeks ago I was on holiday in Genting Highlands, Malaysia. I came across this article by a westerner correspondent in their local newspaper, The New Straits Times. He was talking about the current global financial crisis, and drew parallels with the Asian Financial Crisis a decade ago.
I shall not go into details about the article, but rather, I want to bring to particular attention a term which the author used - the IBG mentality.
What is IBG? Well, it stands for "I'll Be Gone". The majority of the bankers and corporate managers have this I'll Be Gone mentality. This means that they are only interersted in short-term results; and they are willing to sacrifice the future of the companies they are in charge to achieve this. I think we have no lack of examples and I shall skip that part.
There are many reasons for the root causes of this IBG mentality. Indeed, just pick up any western magazines or listen to any western current affairs broadcasts, you will have no lack of explanations given by experts.
Well, I am no expert. But I have been following this financial saga, and interested enough to come up with my own views. I shall share them with readers here.
I have not heard any of the above (i.e. magazines, broadcasts, etc.) mention that the blame lies in a critical aspect of modernity - more specifically, in the separation between ownership and management. I believe the IBG mentality grew inherently out of the fact that ownership is separated from management. As the layers grew more numerous, and more complex, who is responsible for what becomes blurrer and blurrer, until in the end, a manager/management can commit acts so fraudulent as to defy societal conscience. An example was quoted in that article from The News Straits Times :"when someone in the USA who earns USD19,000 per annum can afford to buy and get a loan to finance a house worth USD750,000, you know something is terribly wrong!"
The reason why no one has yet to lay a blame on modernity, is of course political and... uh... come to think of it, i'm writing is blog using the products of modernity... shall i bit the hands that feed me?....
No of course not... lets be clear about this, I do not blame modernity for this state of affairs, per se. Nor do I blame the bankers or corporate managers... really! - when in Rome, do as the Romans do.
I write this article to highlight a flaw of modernity and capitalism - IBG - the "I'll Be Gone" mentality. I hope readers will think about this and ask themselves if they are inflicted with this disease.
I shall not go into details about the article, but rather, I want to bring to particular attention a term which the author used - the IBG mentality.
What is IBG? Well, it stands for "I'll Be Gone". The majority of the bankers and corporate managers have this I'll Be Gone mentality. This means that they are only interersted in short-term results; and they are willing to sacrifice the future of the companies they are in charge to achieve this. I think we have no lack of examples and I shall skip that part.
There are many reasons for the root causes of this IBG mentality. Indeed, just pick up any western magazines or listen to any western current affairs broadcasts, you will have no lack of explanations given by experts.
Well, I am no expert. But I have been following this financial saga, and interested enough to come up with my own views. I shall share them with readers here.
I have not heard any of the above (i.e. magazines, broadcasts, etc.) mention that the blame lies in a critical aspect of modernity - more specifically, in the separation between ownership and management. I believe the IBG mentality grew inherently out of the fact that ownership is separated from management. As the layers grew more numerous, and more complex, who is responsible for what becomes blurrer and blurrer, until in the end, a manager/management can commit acts so fraudulent as to defy societal conscience. An example was quoted in that article from The News Straits Times :"when someone in the USA who earns USD19,000 per annum can afford to buy and get a loan to finance a house worth USD750,000, you know something is terribly wrong!"
The reason why no one has yet to lay a blame on modernity, is of course political and... uh... come to think of it, i'm writing is blog using the products of modernity... shall i bit the hands that feed me?....
No of course not... lets be clear about this, I do not blame modernity for this state of affairs, per se. Nor do I blame the bankers or corporate managers... really! - when in Rome, do as the Romans do.
I write this article to highlight a flaw of modernity and capitalism - IBG - the "I'll Be Gone" mentality. I hope readers will think about this and ask themselves if they are inflicted with this disease.
Monday, December 1, 2008
A Poker Lesson
Last Sunday I hosted and played poker (holdem) with my cousin and friends at my home.
I was playing my ace game right from the beginning. Soon towards the end of the session I was up by nearly $400. We played $0.50/$1 game. However, I lost my entire stack of nearly $400 in one hand (which was to be the last hand of the day). here's how it transpired:
Preflop:
I held Ace-ten unsuited. raised $12 on the button, got 2 callers.
Flop:
ace diamond, something diamond, and something non-diamond.
i raised $30, one guy folded, another called.
Turn:
another diamond.
remaining player checked, i raised $50, he check-raised me $50 plus $100. I considered for a while, re-raise him all in, which he promptly called and turn over King-four of diamond for the nut flush - his hand was unbeatable.
Stupid, stupid moves by me. Why plural (s)? let me walk you through:
1. I was doomed from the start. I wanted to win that particular pot so bad that i disregarded everything else, even when the odds were staring right into my pupils and irises.
2. I talked myself into not believing that my opponent had me beat. Indeed there were so many hands he could have held that would have beaten my Ace pair with 10 kicker - 2 pairs, three of a kind, flush, ace-jack, ace-queen, ace-king....
3. But I still called my opponent's check-raise, and even re-raised him all-in, in the faint hope that he was bluffing....
Stupid, stupid moves...
In retrospect, the best strategy was to walk away when i knew I was beat. I had disregarded my inner voices, disregarded my common sense, my intelligence, my hard-earned knowledge of poker; simply becasue of the fact that I wanted to win that pot. I thought I had to win it... no matter what. I got desperate. And as a result, I fell flat, I got cleaned out of my entire stack.
I think God was trying to teach me something here...
He gave me ace-10 unsuited.
He made 2 loose players call me.
He made the flop came with 2 diamonds.
He made the 3rd diamond appear at the turn.
He gave my opponent 2 crap cards King-four of diamonds, which turn out to be the nuts (the unbeatable hand).
Ok I have to correct a bit on what I said about me being "doomed from the start". God gave me enough warnings along the way, but i refused to listen because I was blinded. I wanted to win. I WANTED TO WIN THAT HAND! AND I GOT HUMBLED THOROUGHLY. Let me explain further:
1. Ace-ten on button - can play a bit aggressive, but not too much, becaue of the relatively weak kicker. I ignore warning, raised 12 times the big blind.
2. 2 loose callers - means proceed with caution on the flop.
3. 2 diamonds - can play a bit more agressive to drive out drawers, but be careful once another diamond comes on the turn. I ignored it all.
4. A big check-raise on the turn all of a sudden by my opponent. I ignored the signs.
The punishment: Got beat by the nuts, don't even need to see the river card.
Now I realised that the best thing to do at that time was to walk away. But my pride and my ambition to win that hand had blinded me.
I could have achieve a spectacular victory (by walking away when I was re-raised at the turn), God had given me that last chance for that hand. But I ignored it.
I hope this defeat will stay with me for a long time (although I wish the pain will lessen.. haha...). I hope this defeat will remind me in whatever I do in the future - always be humble, not blinded by implusive emotions, and listen to my instincts..
Thank you God.
I was playing my ace game right from the beginning. Soon towards the end of the session I was up by nearly $400. We played $0.50/$1 game. However, I lost my entire stack of nearly $400 in one hand (which was to be the last hand of the day). here's how it transpired:
Preflop:
I held Ace-ten unsuited. raised $12 on the button, got 2 callers.
Flop:
ace diamond, something diamond, and something non-diamond.
i raised $30, one guy folded, another called.
Turn:
another diamond.
remaining player checked, i raised $50, he check-raised me $50 plus $100. I considered for a while, re-raise him all in, which he promptly called and turn over King-four of diamond for the nut flush - his hand was unbeatable.
Stupid, stupid moves by me. Why plural (s)? let me walk you through:
1. I was doomed from the start. I wanted to win that particular pot so bad that i disregarded everything else, even when the odds were staring right into my pupils and irises.
2. I talked myself into not believing that my opponent had me beat. Indeed there were so many hands he could have held that would have beaten my Ace pair with 10 kicker - 2 pairs, three of a kind, flush, ace-jack, ace-queen, ace-king....
3. But I still called my opponent's check-raise, and even re-raised him all-in, in the faint hope that he was bluffing....
Stupid, stupid moves...
In retrospect, the best strategy was to walk away when i knew I was beat. I had disregarded my inner voices, disregarded my common sense, my intelligence, my hard-earned knowledge of poker; simply becasue of the fact that I wanted to win that pot. I thought I had to win it... no matter what. I got desperate. And as a result, I fell flat, I got cleaned out of my entire stack.
I think God was trying to teach me something here...
He gave me ace-10 unsuited.
He made 2 loose players call me.
He made the flop came with 2 diamonds.
He made the 3rd diamond appear at the turn.
He gave my opponent 2 crap cards King-four of diamonds, which turn out to be the nuts (the unbeatable hand).
Ok I have to correct a bit on what I said about me being "doomed from the start". God gave me enough warnings along the way, but i refused to listen because I was blinded. I wanted to win. I WANTED TO WIN THAT HAND! AND I GOT HUMBLED THOROUGHLY. Let me explain further:
1. Ace-ten on button - can play a bit aggressive, but not too much, becaue of the relatively weak kicker. I ignore warning, raised 12 times the big blind.
2. 2 loose callers - means proceed with caution on the flop.
3. 2 diamonds - can play a bit more agressive to drive out drawers, but be careful once another diamond comes on the turn. I ignored it all.
4. A big check-raise on the turn all of a sudden by my opponent. I ignored the signs.
The punishment: Got beat by the nuts, don't even need to see the river card.
Now I realised that the best thing to do at that time was to walk away. But my pride and my ambition to win that hand had blinded me.
I could have achieve a spectacular victory (by walking away when I was re-raised at the turn), God had given me that last chance for that hand. But I ignored it.
I hope this defeat will stay with me for a long time (although I wish the pain will lessen.. haha...). I hope this defeat will remind me in whatever I do in the future - always be humble, not blinded by implusive emotions, and listen to my instincts..
Thank you God.
Baby and Maid
The other day we brought Ethan for his immunisation jab at AMK polyclinic. My wife, ,mum and maid went along as well. 2 interesting things happened on this trip. I shall relate one this time round.
While we were waiting for the doctor, we got to speak to a few mums and grandmas, who were there to bring their babies for jab too. In particular, I got to speak to a grandma, during which she gave me an advice. This is how this part of our conversation went:
Grandma: Why do you let the baby have so much physical contact with the maid? (upon seeing that my maid was trying to cuddle Ethan to sleep, and no doubt a rhetorical question)
Me: .... (don't know how to reply, so wait for her to explain further)
Grandma: Once your baby get used to the smell of the maid, he'll stick with her and you'll have trouble gaining his affection. its better to prevent this from the very beginning. wats worse, once your maid leaves, you gonna have trouble cos he'll miss the maid...etc..etc...
Me: .... (nodded, and just smile)
Okay, here's my thought:
Firstly,
How can anyone prevent "love", and still be right? of course i'm not taking about love for heroin or love for lying... i'm talking about love in its purest sense (which i think is undefinable by the way, you just know it).
Ethan is going to spend more time with my maid, or anyone taking care of him, while me and my wife is working. Naturally, he'll feel for his care-takers, and maybe more than he feels for us (mum and dad) at this point in time, simply due to the time they spent with him. Am I going to subject myself to jealousy or guilt simply becuase of that? I don't think so, really.
Me and my wife loves Ethan with all our heart. I'm sure Ethan will come to realise that in time. I am sure he will love us back as well. By him loving and feeling attachment to the maid, does not mean that he has less love to spare for his mum and dad. I think love is stretcheable... not a zero-sum game, it is expandable.. and ideally boundless...
On the other hand, we should feel happy, that he loves his maid. For he has an instinctive understanding of piety, even at this tender age. We should not teach him otherwise.
We should also feel blessed, that our maid really cares for him (we hope and we'll know in time to come).
As such, who are we to "prevent" our baby having "too much" affection for our maid?
--------------------
Many a time, I feel I should spend more time with Ethan, especially during the weekends when he comes back to stay with us. I'm sure my wife feels that too. And we should.
On another note, I feel that we should not revolve our lives around Ethan (I say this with pragmatism, and I can only hope readers understand what I mean). Or we risk burning out in the long run. We should have our fair share of social lives and activities. What this means is that it is okay to take the occassional tea-sessions with friends and leave Ethan in the care of trusted people. It is ok to have the occasional poker sessions (ha...), or any other activities, and NOT feel guilty that the time spent should be with our baby instead.
Of course, its about balancing at the end of the day, never forgetting the foundation laid with love. As such, i resolve to give up my regular holdem session during weekends, but instead spend more time with Ethan and Candy.. Yeah..!
While we were waiting for the doctor, we got to speak to a few mums and grandmas, who were there to bring their babies for jab too. In particular, I got to speak to a grandma, during which she gave me an advice. This is how this part of our conversation went:
Grandma: Why do you let the baby have so much physical contact with the maid? (upon seeing that my maid was trying to cuddle Ethan to sleep, and no doubt a rhetorical question)
Me: .... (don't know how to reply, so wait for her to explain further)
Grandma: Once your baby get used to the smell of the maid, he'll stick with her and you'll have trouble gaining his affection. its better to prevent this from the very beginning. wats worse, once your maid leaves, you gonna have trouble cos he'll miss the maid...etc..etc...
Me: .... (nodded, and just smile)
Okay, here's my thought:
Firstly,
How can anyone prevent "love", and still be right? of course i'm not taking about love for heroin or love for lying... i'm talking about love in its purest sense (which i think is undefinable by the way, you just know it).
Ethan is going to spend more time with my maid, or anyone taking care of him, while me and my wife is working. Naturally, he'll feel for his care-takers, and maybe more than he feels for us (mum and dad) at this point in time, simply due to the time they spent with him. Am I going to subject myself to jealousy or guilt simply becuase of that? I don't think so, really.
Me and my wife loves Ethan with all our heart. I'm sure Ethan will come to realise that in time. I am sure he will love us back as well. By him loving and feeling attachment to the maid, does not mean that he has less love to spare for his mum and dad. I think love is stretcheable... not a zero-sum game, it is expandable.. and ideally boundless...
On the other hand, we should feel happy, that he loves his maid. For he has an instinctive understanding of piety, even at this tender age. We should not teach him otherwise.
We should also feel blessed, that our maid really cares for him (we hope and we'll know in time to come).
As such, who are we to "prevent" our baby having "too much" affection for our maid?
--------------------
Many a time, I feel I should spend more time with Ethan, especially during the weekends when he comes back to stay with us. I'm sure my wife feels that too. And we should.
On another note, I feel that we should not revolve our lives around Ethan (I say this with pragmatism, and I can only hope readers understand what I mean). Or we risk burning out in the long run. We should have our fair share of social lives and activities. What this means is that it is okay to take the occassional tea-sessions with friends and leave Ethan in the care of trusted people. It is ok to have the occasional poker sessions (ha...), or any other activities, and NOT feel guilty that the time spent should be with our baby instead.
Of course, its about balancing at the end of the day, never forgetting the foundation laid with love. As such, i resolve to give up my regular holdem session during weekends, but instead spend more time with Ethan and Candy.. Yeah..!
Friday, November 28, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Ethan's Photos
I realised Candy's photos of Ethan are much more interesting and animated than mine. I am using DSLR with prime lenses, while Candy uses normal digi camera. I am very humbled.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Bank Crises and Bankers' Renumeration Part 2
My wife just asked me why is it that some US politicians are billing the latest financial crisis as being the worst since the Great Depression. That sets me thinking...
Does the current situation even warrant a comparison with the Great Depression? Lets picture this scenario:
Great Depression: Tens of thousands of unemployed queueing for jobs every morning at factories, only a handful got picked for the day's work, the rest go home and come back next day for the lottery.
Current situation: I see tens of thousands still with their jobs. Many more voluntarily out of jobs.
I just need to illustrate the above scenario to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the current situation is nowhere near the Great Depression.
So, why are McCains and Obamas and soon to be ex-president Bush's and company painting such a stark economic picture with the Great Depression as the backdrop?
Answer is very simple my friend.
Lets assume I am a presidential candidate, and you are my supporter. You are a billionaire, and you contribute millions of dollars to my presidential campaign. I need your connections and money to fund my campaign, so I have a higher chance of securing the world's most powerful vocation.
But now, you are losing hundreds of millions in shares and what-have-yous. lets say you have USD1billion worth of shares, which are only worth USD500million on paper now, due to the current economic crisis. Obviously you are not pleased. So you suggest to me, why not scare the public with the spectre of a looming Great Depression, so that the public will consent to me using the public's money to bail you out. So that, having used the public's money to bailout, your current USD500million will once again surge up to USD1billion, or possibly even more.
In this way, you have your money, and I, with your support, secures the world's most powerful vocation, and the public, seeing that I have successfully averted the second Great Depression, will adore me no less.
Perfect. Win-win-win.
Does the current situation even warrant a comparison with the Great Depression? Lets picture this scenario:
Great Depression: Tens of thousands of unemployed queueing for jobs every morning at factories, only a handful got picked for the day's work, the rest go home and come back next day for the lottery.
Current situation: I see tens of thousands still with their jobs. Many more voluntarily out of jobs.
I just need to illustrate the above scenario to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the current situation is nowhere near the Great Depression.
So, why are McCains and Obamas and soon to be ex-president Bush's and company painting such a stark economic picture with the Great Depression as the backdrop?
Answer is very simple my friend.
Lets assume I am a presidential candidate, and you are my supporter. You are a billionaire, and you contribute millions of dollars to my presidential campaign. I need your connections and money to fund my campaign, so I have a higher chance of securing the world's most powerful vocation.
But now, you are losing hundreds of millions in shares and what-have-yous. lets say you have USD1billion worth of shares, which are only worth USD500million on paper now, due to the current economic crisis. Obviously you are not pleased. So you suggest to me, why not scare the public with the spectre of a looming Great Depression, so that the public will consent to me using the public's money to bail you out. So that, having used the public's money to bailout, your current USD500million will once again surge up to USD1billion, or possibly even more.
In this way, you have your money, and I, with your support, secures the world's most powerful vocation, and the public, seeing that I have successfully averted the second Great Depression, will adore me no less.
Perfect. Win-win-win.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Genting Poker Tournament
I recently joined a poker tournament at Genting Casino. Went up with my wife, a fren, and a cousin over the weekend.
Managed to squeezed into the final table of 10. Came out 6th, out of a field of 300 contestants.
Prize money is a tiny RM3,000... :). Well, considering that the entry fee was RM500, and that included a complimentary room at the Resort Hotel, plus another complimentary room if one got into the semi-finals, I think thats not too bad a deal at all!
For your info, the first prize was RM75,000, second: RM30,000, Third: RM15,000, 4th to 5th: RM5,000, 6th to 10th: RM3,000. So you can see that i just missed out on 5th, which would have netted me another RM2k.
In fact, there was very little I could do at the final table, due to the fact that I was short-stacked all the way, and that the blinds were exceedingly high. I won the first hand, with an all-in with Ace-Jack, the flop came Ace-Jack-something, in the end I managed to KO 2 players with Jacks full of Aces. Not a bad start. Thereafter, I din have cards to even call the big blinds. Hence I folded and folded, whenever anyone at the table showed any strength. I gave them the benefit of doubt.
My final hand played out like this: first player folded, player 2 limped in just calling the big blind, player 3 folded, Me: after eye-balling player 2 and sizing him up for 6 seconds, I pushed all my stack all-in with Ace-Jack (and silently hoping others behind me fold) I gathered I have a better chance of heads-up with player 2, since he has been calling with rags many a times. Also, other players have been playing very tight. Even if someone behind called with any pairs less than jacks i would still be even-money. True enough, all players behind me folded to Player 2.
Now, i would be happy if player 2 folded at this point, cos my Ace-jack would be a severe underdog against ace queen or ace king (which I dun think he had since he just called the big blind), or just a coin flip with 10pairs or below. On the other hand, knowing player 2, I would not have minded if he called me, because he would have called me with Ace-10 or something worse, which by then I would be a super over-dog over him.
As it turned out, Player 2 called me. And true enough my read on him was correct. He had Ace-6 suited (diamonds). For the maths-inclined, that means I am 66% favourite to win, over his 27%, with approx 7% ending in a tie. I'm a favourite to win. Flop came out rainbow rags. By this time I'm in an even better position to win (80%). Player 2 can only win with a 6, or a runner runner diamond flush. Guess what... of course he caught the runner runner flush!!
Well, i told myself before the final table that I would go out with a bang. And a bang I did went out with. I guessed I could have played very very tight, and maybe I could have gotten 5th or 4th, and thus an additional RM2k. But I know I would not be satisfied if I had not play to the best of my judgment and ability, which I did when I pushed all-in with Ace-Jack against Player 2. The downside was that this "correct play" costed me RM2k.
Overall it has been a very good experience. I won some more at the tables. And of course my wife was with me all the while, which was the most important of all :)
Managed to squeezed into the final table of 10. Came out 6th, out of a field of 300 contestants.
Prize money is a tiny RM3,000... :). Well, considering that the entry fee was RM500, and that included a complimentary room at the Resort Hotel, plus another complimentary room if one got into the semi-finals, I think thats not too bad a deal at all!
For your info, the first prize was RM75,000, second: RM30,000, Third: RM15,000, 4th to 5th: RM5,000, 6th to 10th: RM3,000. So you can see that i just missed out on 5th, which would have netted me another RM2k.
In fact, there was very little I could do at the final table, due to the fact that I was short-stacked all the way, and that the blinds were exceedingly high. I won the first hand, with an all-in with Ace-Jack, the flop came Ace-Jack-something, in the end I managed to KO 2 players with Jacks full of Aces. Not a bad start. Thereafter, I din have cards to even call the big blinds. Hence I folded and folded, whenever anyone at the table showed any strength. I gave them the benefit of doubt.
My final hand played out like this: first player folded, player 2 limped in just calling the big blind, player 3 folded, Me: after eye-balling player 2 and sizing him up for 6 seconds, I pushed all my stack all-in with Ace-Jack (and silently hoping others behind me fold) I gathered I have a better chance of heads-up with player 2, since he has been calling with rags many a times. Also, other players have been playing very tight. Even if someone behind called with any pairs less than jacks i would still be even-money. True enough, all players behind me folded to Player 2.
Now, i would be happy if player 2 folded at this point, cos my Ace-jack would be a severe underdog against ace queen or ace king (which I dun think he had since he just called the big blind), or just a coin flip with 10pairs or below. On the other hand, knowing player 2, I would not have minded if he called me, because he would have called me with Ace-10 or something worse, which by then I would be a super over-dog over him.
As it turned out, Player 2 called me. And true enough my read on him was correct. He had Ace-6 suited (diamonds). For the maths-inclined, that means I am 66% favourite to win, over his 27%, with approx 7% ending in a tie. I'm a favourite to win. Flop came out rainbow rags. By this time I'm in an even better position to win (80%). Player 2 can only win with a 6, or a runner runner diamond flush. Guess what... of course he caught the runner runner flush!!
Well, i told myself before the final table that I would go out with a bang. And a bang I did went out with. I guessed I could have played very very tight, and maybe I could have gotten 5th or 4th, and thus an additional RM2k. But I know I would not be satisfied if I had not play to the best of my judgment and ability, which I did when I pushed all-in with Ace-Jack against Player 2. The downside was that this "correct play" costed me RM2k.
Overall it has been a very good experience. I won some more at the tables. And of course my wife was with me all the while, which was the most important of all :)
Thursday, September 11, 2008
_edited.jpg)
_edited.jpg)
Friday, September 5, 2008
A Quick Response to How to identify 'Churchills' here?
I came across this article on asiaone.com, which was first published in the Straits Times on 2nd September 2008. It was written by Mr Tan Soon Hock.
The synopsis of the article can be described as: Our society does not identify, and hence fails to develope people like Winston Churchil. Our system of meritocracy does not tolerate such mavericks.
My response:
1. Mavericks cannot be identified, much less developed. We can only identify what is within society's conscious, not outside.
2. England is mature enough to tolerate mavericks like Churchills, but at the same time they tolerated Jack the Rippers. One cannot have the cake and eat it. I do not think our society is ready yet.
3. Time produces its mavericks in the form of heros and anti-heroes - Churchills, Hilters. Mr Tan yearns for such personas. Mr Tan might have asked for more than what he actually wants.
4. Mr Tan has asked the wrong question.
The synopsis of the article can be described as: Our society does not identify, and hence fails to develope people like Winston Churchil. Our system of meritocracy does not tolerate such mavericks.
My response:
1. Mavericks cannot be identified, much less developed. We can only identify what is within society's conscious, not outside.
2. England is mature enough to tolerate mavericks like Churchills, but at the same time they tolerated Jack the Rippers. One cannot have the cake and eat it. I do not think our society is ready yet.
3. Time produces its mavericks in the form of heros and anti-heroes - Churchills, Hilters. Mr Tan yearns for such personas. Mr Tan might have asked for more than what he actually wants.
4. Mr Tan has asked the wrong question.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
My Firstborn arrived on our National Day
Baby Ethan Lim arrived to this world on 9th August 2008. I thank God and Jesus that both mummy and baby are fine.
There are so many feelings, and many so of them undescribable, that I thought would be too presumptious to pen them down. I will not attempt to do that. Instead, I will only say I am happy and grateful.
I do not know what awaits me. I asks God for wisdom and courage to walk an honest path.
There are so many feelings, and many so of them undescribable, that I thought would be too presumptious to pen them down. I will not attempt to do that. Instead, I will only say I am happy and grateful.
I do not know what awaits me. I asks God for wisdom and courage to walk an honest path.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Singapore Girls: Hot
An article in Matador Nights, an online travel magazine, claims our garden city breeds amongst the sexiest girls outside of USA. The article also lists another 9 cities with similar trait.
Great article this. Our economy will benefit from it. I reckon short term gain to be at least 0.01% real GDP growth can be directly attributable to this article. Long-term gain? Snowballing, and with careful planning on our part, we stand to at least gain 100%, or double the size of our current economy - all direct contribution from this article.
Want to know my reason?
Women attracts action in all its form.
Go read about the beginnings of Trojan War, or Romance of Three Kingdoms (the chapter on the Battle of the Red Ciff).
Or play basketball when girls are around.
But of course, there are dangers lurking too. Read further on the Trojan War and the Red Cliff, you will know why. Or, ever wonder why we are more prone to injuries when girls are around the basketball court?
Great article this. Our economy will benefit from it. I reckon short term gain to be at least 0.01% real GDP growth can be directly attributable to this article. Long-term gain? Snowballing, and with careful planning on our part, we stand to at least gain 100%, or double the size of our current economy - all direct contribution from this article.
Want to know my reason?
Women attracts action in all its form.
Go read about the beginnings of Trojan War, or Romance of Three Kingdoms (the chapter on the Battle of the Red Ciff).
Or play basketball when girls are around.
But of course, there are dangers lurking too. Read further on the Trojan War and the Red Cliff, you will know why. Or, ever wonder why we are more prone to injuries when girls are around the basketball court?
Monday, July 14, 2008
Automatic Transmission Versus Manual Transmission
The following was posted on an internet forum in October last year. http://myfastgti.com/volkswagen/showthread.php/dsg-vs-manual-true-drivers-standpoint-451p10.html
I got quite a few pats on the back by fellow forumers who agreed with me; and of course, there were those who disagreed with my views and tried to invalid my arguments.
Maybe a little background as to why I wrote this post. I got more than my fair share of jibes from psuedo-manual trans purists for driving an auto sports coupe (Honda Integra, aka Acura RSX). Hence, I retorted that they (the manual trans purists) will be relegated to hobby status in the near future. To those who read between the lines, this is akin to saying that the purists will be sidelined to the irrelevances. This post was a way to get back at them. Of course, all this was done in good humour :)
ps: upon re-reading my post, i felt i could've tidied up some loose ends, but to be fair to those who responded, i decided to publish the unabridged version.
Here it goes:
Assertion:
I assert that Automatic transmission, will account for 90-95% of the cars in the next 50 years.
Definition:
For simplicity sake, automatic transmission means clutchless transmission, which includes torque converter, smg, dsg, etc. that means you don't have to manually clutch in and out to change gears.
Argument:
1. AT technoloogy has improved to a level where the machine can actually shift faster than human.
2. AT technology is actually more power efficient. by shifting faster than a human can, AT reduces power loss experienced during shifting. dsg's 8ms vs ferraris enzo's 120ms vs human's actions of approx 200ms. the best AT beats the best human's actions by more than 20 times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-Shift_Gearbox
yes, dsg is heavier, but the odds of them getting lighter as technology advances, against a human losing weight, well... you get the picture.
3. AT technology has been proven, and adopted, at the pinnacle of motor sports, eg. WRC, F1, drag racing, etc. but of course you will argue they at at the TOP, how many can get access to those technology?
consider this: the at the birth of internet, only a select few has access to it, during the early 60s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet#Creation, but how many pple access the internet now?
4. "Completing the MISSION" vs "FLYING the mission" (take note of the caps). with the advances in warplane technologies (or even commercial ariplanes), the trend is towards more automation to achieve higher mission success rates, and less dependability on human skills. put simply, "reduce the volatility and variability of human skills, just get the MISSION accomplished."
put this in the context of daily driving. the mission here is to get from point A to point B. well, AT will get that done more efficiently and effectively.
5. stubborn purists will cling on to their old and soon-to-be deluded argument that" driving a manual get more control, more feel, more fun, most of the time much faster, won't trade that more a puny AT."
well, consider this, during the late 1880s when automobiles are still at their infancy, i'd imagine those then-purist, the horse riders, mocking the ugly piece of steel and motor, saying they "won't trade their beloved horses for a puny motorcar". riding a horse requires more skill, can get more feel, more control, than driving those cars.
u can imagine a skilled horseman telling a motorcar driver:
"hey i control my horses better than u" (modern version: "hey i can change gears, rev-match, do watever, control my car better than your AT")
or
"hey my horse cost so much less than your car and can go much faster" (modern version: "hey my MT is cheaper but much faster than your AT..." (sounds familiar?))
i could go on, but u get my drift.
Conclusion and Future
AT is here to stay. And they will grow in numbers faster and faster, for, but not limited, to reasons i have provided - cost, efficiency, and mission.
MT purist will be relegated (or promoted, if you like) to the peripheral status of a hobby or sports. just like horse-riding is a hobby or a sports now.
And in the words of Peter Drucker: the future is here now.
I got quite a few pats on the back by fellow forumers who agreed with me; and of course, there were those who disagreed with my views and tried to invalid my arguments.
Maybe a little background as to why I wrote this post. I got more than my fair share of jibes from psuedo-manual trans purists for driving an auto sports coupe (Honda Integra, aka Acura RSX). Hence, I retorted that they (the manual trans purists) will be relegated to hobby status in the near future. To those who read between the lines, this is akin to saying that the purists will be sidelined to the irrelevances. This post was a way to get back at them. Of course, all this was done in good humour :)
ps: upon re-reading my post, i felt i could've tidied up some loose ends, but to be fair to those who responded, i decided to publish the unabridged version.
Here it goes:
Assertion:
I assert that Automatic transmission, will account for 90-95% of the cars in the next 50 years.
Definition:
For simplicity sake, automatic transmission means clutchless transmission, which includes torque converter, smg, dsg, etc. that means you don't have to manually clutch in and out to change gears.
Argument:
1. AT technoloogy has improved to a level where the machine can actually shift faster than human.
2. AT technology is actually more power efficient. by shifting faster than a human can, AT reduces power loss experienced during shifting. dsg's 8ms vs ferraris enzo's 120ms vs human's actions of approx 200ms. the best AT beats the best human's actions by more than 20 times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct-Shift_Gearbox
yes, dsg is heavier, but the odds of them getting lighter as technology advances, against a human losing weight, well... you get the picture.
3. AT technology has been proven, and adopted, at the pinnacle of motor sports, eg. WRC, F1, drag racing, etc. but of course you will argue they at at the TOP, how many can get access to those technology?
consider this: the at the birth of internet, only a select few has access to it, during the early 60s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet#Creation, but how many pple access the internet now?
4. "Completing the MISSION" vs "FLYING the mission" (take note of the caps). with the advances in warplane technologies (or even commercial ariplanes), the trend is towards more automation to achieve higher mission success rates, and less dependability on human skills. put simply, "reduce the volatility and variability of human skills, just get the MISSION accomplished."
put this in the context of daily driving. the mission here is to get from point A to point B. well, AT will get that done more efficiently and effectively.
5. stubborn purists will cling on to their old and soon-to-be deluded argument that" driving a manual get more control, more feel, more fun, most of the time much faster, won't trade that more a puny AT."
well, consider this, during the late 1880s when automobiles are still at their infancy, i'd imagine those then-purist, the horse riders, mocking the ugly piece of steel and motor, saying they "won't trade their beloved horses for a puny motorcar". riding a horse requires more skill, can get more feel, more control, than driving those cars.
u can imagine a skilled horseman telling a motorcar driver:
"hey i control my horses better than u" (modern version: "hey i can change gears, rev-match, do watever, control my car better than your AT")
or
"hey my horse cost so much less than your car and can go much faster" (modern version: "hey my MT is cheaper but much faster than your AT..." (sounds familiar?))
i could go on, but u get my drift.
Conclusion and Future
AT is here to stay. And they will grow in numbers faster and faster, for, but not limited, to reasons i have provided - cost, efficiency, and mission.
MT purist will be relegated (or promoted, if you like) to the peripheral status of a hobby or sports. just like horse-riding is a hobby or a sports now.
And in the words of Peter Drucker: the future is here now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)